Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Parliamentary Protocol: Upholding Dignity and Procedures in India's Legislative Framework

Parliamentary Protocol: Upholding Dignity and Procedures in India's Legislative Framework





Articles 118 to 122 of the Indian Constitution delineate the procedures, rules, and functioning of the Parliament, regulating its sessions, conduct, and proceedings.

Article 118: Rules of Procedure

Article 118 empowers each House of Parliament to make rules to regulate its procedures and conduct of business. It grants autonomy to the Houses in framing their rules while ensuring conformity with constitutional principles.

Article 119: Regulation of Procedure

Article 119 stipulates that until rules are framed by the Houses, the Parliament shall regulate its procedure based on existing laws and practices inherited from the constituent assembly.

Article 120: Language to be Used

Article 120 deals with the language to be used in the Parliament, specifying that either English or Hindi may be used for proceedings and debates.

Article 121: Restriction on Discussions

Article 121 prohibits the discussion of conduct of judges of the Supreme Court or High Courts unless a resolution for their removal is under consideration.

Article 122: Courts not to Inquire into Proceedings

Article 122 bars any court from inquiring into parliamentary proceedings, ensuring the autonomy and immunity of parliamentary debates from judicial scrutiny.

Modern Era Interpretation:

In the contemporary era, these articles retain their significance in regulating parliamentary procedures and preserving the sanctity of parliamentary debates. While not heavily reliant on extensive case laws, their interpretation and application have been shaped by constitutional principles, parliamentary practices, and occasional legal interventions.

Parliamentary Practices and Relevance:

The rules and procedures framed by the Houses of Parliament reflect the practical application of these articles, ensuring smooth conduct of sessions and adherence to established norms.

### Contemporary Relevance and Challenges:

In the contemporary landscape, Articles 118 to 122 face challenges related to maintaining decorum in parliamentary proceedings, ensuring multilingual incivility, and upholding parliamentary autonomy.

Balancing the use of languages, maintaining parliamentary decorum, and protecting parliamentary immunity while fostering constructive debates pose challenges in upholding the efficacy and dignity of these articles.

Conclusion:

Articles 118 to 122 of the Indian Constitution delineate the rules and procedures governing Parliament's functioning, ensuring the smooth conduct of sessions and preserving the autonomy of parliamentary proceedings. While not heavily reliant on extensive case laws, their interpretation and application resonate with constitutional principles and the need for effective parliamentary governance.

As India navigates through the intricacies of parliamentary conduct in the 21st century, the need to uphold parliamentary decorum, linguistic incivility, and autonomy remains pivotal. Occasional legal interventions and evolving practices continue to shape and refine the operational aspects of these articles, underscoring their enduring significance in fostering a robust and responsible parliamentary democracy within the Indian constitutional framework.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more