Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Articles 124 to 147: The Supreme Court and its Functions

Articles 124 to 147: The Supreme Court and its Functions



Articles 124 to 147 of the Indian Constitution delineate the establishment, composition, powers, and functioning of the Supreme Court of India.


Article 124: Establishment and Constitution of the Supreme Court


Article 124 deals with the establishment of the Supreme Court, comprising a Chief Justice of India (CJI) and other judges as determined by law.


Articles 125 to 147: Composition, Appointment, and Functions


These articles specify the qualifications, appointment, tenure, removal, and jurisdiction of Supreme Court judges, along with the court's powers, functions, and procedures.


Modern Era Interpretation:


In the contemporary era, these articles remain fundamental in defining the structure and functioning of the Supreme Court. While not heavily reliant on extensive case laws covering these specific articles, their interpretation and application have been shaped by landmark judicial pronouncements and significant instances.


Key Instances and Judicial Pronouncements:


S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1982): In this case, known as the "First Judges Case," the Supreme Court ruled that the Chief Justice of India's opinion holds primacy in appointing judges, establishing the "collegium system" for judicial appointments.


Second Judges Case (1993): This case reinforced the "collegium system" by emphasizing the judiciary's role in the appointment and transfer of judges, highlighting the judiciary's independence in these matters.


Third Judges Case (1998): The Supreme Court expanded the collegium system's scope, reiterating its authority in judicial appointments while setting guidelines for consultation between the Executive and the Chief Justice of India.


Contemporary Relevance and Challenges:


In the contemporary landscape, Articles 124 to 147 face challenges and hold significant relevance in upholding the independence, integrity, and effectiveness of the Supreme Court:


Judicial Appointments:

The collegium system has faced criticism, particularly concerning transparency and accountability in judicial appointments, prompting debates about reforming the process.


Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation (PIL):

The Supreme Court's role in judicial activism and interpreting PILs has sparked discussions about balancing judicial intervention with the separation of powers and governmental accountability.


Conclusion:


Articles 124 to 147 of the Indian Constitution form the bedrock of the Supreme Court's establishment, composition, and functioning. While not extensively backed by numerous case laws specifically pertaining to each article, landmark judicial pronouncements have significantly influenced their interpretation and application, particularly concerning judicial appointments and the court's powers.


As India navigates through the intricacies of judicial governance in the 21st century, the need to balance judicial independence, accountability, and the effective functioning of the Supreme Court remains pivotal. Occasional legal interventions and evolving practices continue to shape and refine the operational aspects of these articles, underscoring their enduring significance in fostering a robust and impartial judicial system within the Indian constitutional framework.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more