Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Articles 124 to 147: The Supreme Court and its Functions

Articles 124 to 147: The Supreme Court and its Functions



Articles 124 to 147 of the Indian Constitution delineate the establishment, composition, powers, and functioning of the Supreme Court of India.


Article 124: Establishment and Constitution of the Supreme Court


Article 124 deals with the establishment of the Supreme Court, comprising a Chief Justice of India (CJI) and other judges as determined by law.


Articles 125 to 147: Composition, Appointment, and Functions


These articles specify the qualifications, appointment, tenure, removal, and jurisdiction of Supreme Court judges, along with the court's powers, functions, and procedures.


Modern Era Interpretation:


In the contemporary era, these articles remain fundamental in defining the structure and functioning of the Supreme Court. While not heavily reliant on extensive case laws covering these specific articles, their interpretation and application have been shaped by landmark judicial pronouncements and significant instances.


Key Instances and Judicial Pronouncements:


S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1982): In this case, known as the "First Judges Case," the Supreme Court ruled that the Chief Justice of India's opinion holds primacy in appointing judges, establishing the "collegium system" for judicial appointments.


Second Judges Case (1993): This case reinforced the "collegium system" by emphasizing the judiciary's role in the appointment and transfer of judges, highlighting the judiciary's independence in these matters.


Third Judges Case (1998): The Supreme Court expanded the collegium system's scope, reiterating its authority in judicial appointments while setting guidelines for consultation between the Executive and the Chief Justice of India.


Contemporary Relevance and Challenges:


In the contemporary landscape, Articles 124 to 147 face challenges and hold significant relevance in upholding the independence, integrity, and effectiveness of the Supreme Court:


Judicial Appointments:

The collegium system has faced criticism, particularly concerning transparency and accountability in judicial appointments, prompting debates about reforming the process.


Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation (PIL):

The Supreme Court's role in judicial activism and interpreting PILs has sparked discussions about balancing judicial intervention with the separation of powers and governmental accountability.


Conclusion:


Articles 124 to 147 of the Indian Constitution form the bedrock of the Supreme Court's establishment, composition, and functioning. While not extensively backed by numerous case laws specifically pertaining to each article, landmark judicial pronouncements have significantly influenced their interpretation and application, particularly concerning judicial appointments and the court's powers.


As India navigates through the intricacies of judicial governance in the 21st century, the need to balance judicial independence, accountability, and the effective functioning of the Supreme Court remains pivotal. Occasional legal interventions and evolving practices continue to shape and refine the operational aspects of these articles, underscoring their enduring significance in fostering a robust and impartial judicial system within the Indian constitutional framework.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more