Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Articles 105 to 106: Parliamentary Privileges and Immunities

Articles 105 to 106: Parliamentary Privileges and Immunities



Articles 105 to 106 of the Indian Constitution safeguard the privileges, immunities, and powers of the Parliament and its members. They aim to ensure the independence and autonomy of parliamentary proceedings while upholding the integrity of the legislative process.


Article 105: Powers, Privileges, and Immunities of Parliament and Members


Article 105 outlines the powers, privileges, and immunities of the Parliament and its members, emphasizing the freedom of speech, freedom from arrest, and exemption from attendance as witnesses.


Article 106: Salaries and Allowances of Members


Article 106 pertains to the salaries and allowances of members of Parliament, ensuring financial independence and stability for legislators.


Modern Era Interpretation:


In the contemporary era, Articles 105 to 106 continue to hold significance in safeguarding the functioning and independence of Parliament. While not heavily reliant on extensive case laws, their interpretation and application have been shaped by constitutional principles and occasional legal interventions.


Case Laws and Relevance:


P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (1998): In this case, the Supreme Court upheld parliamentary privileges, emphasizing the autonomy of legislative proceedings and the freedom of legislators to express themselves without fear of legal repercussions.


Raja Ram Pal v. Hon'ble Speaker, Lok Sabha (2007): This case emphasized the Speaker's authority in maintaining the dignity and autonomy of Parliament, underscoring the importance of parliamentary privileges in protecting legislative functioning.


Contemporary Relevance and Challenges:


In the contemporary landscape, Articles 105 to 106 face challenges related to striking a balance between parliamentary privileges and the accountability of legislators. The potential misuse or misinterpretation of these privileges can hinder transparency and accountability in legislative proceedings.


Ensuring that parliamentary privileges are not used to shield misconduct or obstruct accountability mechanisms remains a challenge. The need to interpret these privileges in line with the constitutional framework and democratic values is crucial in maintaining the credibility and effectiveness of the legislative process.


Conclusion:


Articles 105 to 106 of the Indian Constitution uphold the privileges, immunities, and financial independence of Parliament and its members, fostering the autonomy and integrity of legislative proceedings. While not extensively backed by numerous case laws, their interpretation and application resonate with constitutional principles and the need to safeguard parliamentary functioning.


As India progresses in the 21st century, the need to balance these privileges with the accountability of legislators remains pivotal. Occasional legal interventions and evolving practices continue to shape and refine the operational aspects of these articles, underscoring their enduring significance in fostering an independent and robust parliamentary democracy within the Indian constitutional framework.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more