Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Articles 105 to 106: Parliamentary Privileges and Immunities

Articles 105 to 106: Parliamentary Privileges and Immunities



Articles 105 to 106 of the Indian Constitution safeguard the privileges, immunities, and powers of the Parliament and its members. They aim to ensure the independence and autonomy of parliamentary proceedings while upholding the integrity of the legislative process.


Article 105: Powers, Privileges, and Immunities of Parliament and Members


Article 105 outlines the powers, privileges, and immunities of the Parliament and its members, emphasizing the freedom of speech, freedom from arrest, and exemption from attendance as witnesses.


Article 106: Salaries and Allowances of Members


Article 106 pertains to the salaries and allowances of members of Parliament, ensuring financial independence and stability for legislators.


Modern Era Interpretation:


In the contemporary era, Articles 105 to 106 continue to hold significance in safeguarding the functioning and independence of Parliament. While not heavily reliant on extensive case laws, their interpretation and application have been shaped by constitutional principles and occasional legal interventions.


Case Laws and Relevance:


P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (1998): In this case, the Supreme Court upheld parliamentary privileges, emphasizing the autonomy of legislative proceedings and the freedom of legislators to express themselves without fear of legal repercussions.


Raja Ram Pal v. Hon'ble Speaker, Lok Sabha (2007): This case emphasized the Speaker's authority in maintaining the dignity and autonomy of Parliament, underscoring the importance of parliamentary privileges in protecting legislative functioning.


Contemporary Relevance and Challenges:


In the contemporary landscape, Articles 105 to 106 face challenges related to striking a balance between parliamentary privileges and the accountability of legislators. The potential misuse or misinterpretation of these privileges can hinder transparency and accountability in legislative proceedings.


Ensuring that parliamentary privileges are not used to shield misconduct or obstruct accountability mechanisms remains a challenge. The need to interpret these privileges in line with the constitutional framework and democratic values is crucial in maintaining the credibility and effectiveness of the legislative process.


Conclusion:


Articles 105 to 106 of the Indian Constitution uphold the privileges, immunities, and financial independence of Parliament and its members, fostering the autonomy and integrity of legislative proceedings. While not extensively backed by numerous case laws, their interpretation and application resonate with constitutional principles and the need to safeguard parliamentary functioning.


As India progresses in the 21st century, the need to balance these privileges with the accountability of legislators remains pivotal. Occasional legal interventions and evolving practices continue to shape and refine the operational aspects of these articles, underscoring their enduring significance in fostering an independent and robust parliamentary democracy within the Indian constitutional framework.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more