Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Articles 101 to 104: Disqualifications, Office of Profit, and Vacancies in Parliament

Articles 101 to 104: Disqualifications, Office of Profit, and Vacancies in Parliament



Articles 101 to 104 of the Indian Constitution address disqualifications of members of Parliament (MPs) on certain grounds, dealing with issues related to holding an office of profit, tenure, and vacancies in the Houses of Parliament.


Article 101: Vacation of Seats


Article 101 details the circumstances under which a seat in the Parliament shall become vacant, including disqualifications on certain grounds, such as holding an office of profit under the government.


Article 102: Disqualifications for Membership


Article 102 outlines disqualifications for being chosen as, or for being, a member of either House of Parliament. It specifies various conditions that render a person ineligible for parliamentary membership, including holding an office of profit, unsoundness of mind, and disqualifications under any law made by Parliament.


Articles 103 and 104: Decision on Disqualifications


Articles 103 and 104 confer the authority to decide on disqualifications of MPs and the power to make rules regarding such disqualifications to the President, subject to judicial review.


Modern Era Interpretation:


In the contemporary era, these articles hold significant relevance in ensuring the integrity and probity of parliamentary members, addressing conflicts of interest, and upholding constitutional principles. While not extensively backed by numerous case laws, their interpretation and application have evolved through judicial pronouncements and legislative interventions.


Case Laws and Relevance:


Jaya Bachchan Disqualification Case (2006): In this case, the Supreme Court upheld Jaya Bachchan's disqualification as an MP due to holding an office of profit. The court emphasized the strict interpretation of the office of profit clause to maintain the purity of legislative functioning, aligning with the provisions outlined in Articles 101 to 104.


Rajasthan Legislative Assembly v. Union of India (2016): While not directly related to these articles, this case highlighted the issue of office of profit, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the independence and impartiality of elected representatives.


Contemporary Relevance and Challenges:


In the contemporary landscape, Articles 101 to 104 face challenges related to defining the scope of an "office of profit," addressing conflicts of interest, and ensuring stringent compliance to uphold the integrity of parliamentary functioning.


The interpretation and application of these articles in the context of evolving governance, diverse roles held by MPs, and changing societal norms pose challenges in maintaining a delicate balance between disqualifications and legitimate pursuits by elected representatives.


Conclusion:


Articles 101 to 104 of the Indian Constitution serve as safeguards to uphold the integrity and impartiality of parliamentary members, delineating provisions for disqualifications, office of profit, and addressing vacancies in the Parliament. While not heavily reliant on extensive case laws, their interpretation and application resonate with the evolving democratic ethos and constitutional principles.


As India navigates through the complexities of parliamentary governance in the 21st century, the need to balance ethical conduct, conflict resolution, and legitimate roles held by MPs remains pivotal. Occasional legal interventions and evolving practices continue to shape and refine the operational aspects of these articles, underscoring their enduring significance in fostering an ethical and accountable parliamentary democracy within the Indian constitutional framework.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more