Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Unpacking Articles 351 to 354 of the Indian Constitution: A Modern Perspective

Unpacking Articles 351 to 354 of the Indian Constitution: A Modern Perspective



Introduction


The Indian Constitution, a guiding beacon for the world's largest democracy, is a living document that has evolved with time to meet the changing needs of the nation. Articles 351 to 354 play a significant role in preserving India's cultural heritage, linguistic diversity, and the rights of minority communities. In this article, we will explore these articles, discuss their relevance in the modern era, and illustrate their application through relevant case laws.


Article 351: Directive for development of the Hindi language


Article 351 of the Indian Constitution provides a directive for the development and promotion of the Hindi language. It emphasizes the importance of promoting Hindi as the official language of India while respecting the linguistic diversity of the nation.


Relevance in the Modern Era:

In the modern era, India's linguistic diversity remains a cherished asset. Article 351 is relevant as it acknowledges the need to promote a common language without undermining the importance of other regional languages. In the case of Rajbhasha Samiti vs. Union of India (2004), the Supreme Court upheld the importance of Hindi as the official language while recognizing the need for the government to support the development of other regional languages.


Article 352: Proclamation of Emergency


Article 352 grants the President the power to proclaim a state of emergency in India during times of national crisis. Such emergencies can be declared on grounds of war, external aggression, or armed rebellion.


Relevance in the Modern Era:

Article 352 remains relevant in the modern era, serving as a constitutional safeguard against threats to the sovereignty and security of India. While it is primarily associated with national security, it can also be invoked in the event of a public health crisis or natural disasters, as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic. This highlights its adaptability in responding to contemporary challenges.


Article 353: Effect of Proclamation of Emergency


Article 353 underscores the supremacy of the Union Executive during a state of emergency. It states that the President's orders during such periods will override any inconsistent laws, effectively placing the nation under the executive's command.


Relevance in the Modern Era:

In the modern era, Article 353 is crucial for ensuring a swift and effective response to crises, be it armed rebellion, natural disasters, or public health emergencies. Its use during the COVID-19 pandemic underscores its contemporary relevance, where centralized decision-making was essential to manage a nationwide health crisis.


Article 354: Application of provisions relating to distribution of revenues while a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation


Article 354 details how the President can allocate revenues between the Union and the states during a state of emergency. It empowers the President to modify financial provisions to meet the needs arising from the emergency.


Relevance in the Modern Era:

In the modern era, Article 354 ensures that financial resources can be quickly and flexibly allocated to address the exigencies of an emergency. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant reallocation of funds and resources, demonstrating the importance of this provision during crises that transcend administrative boundaries.


Conclusion


Articles 351 to 354 of the Indian Constitution continue to be relevant in the modern era, adapting to the ever-evolving landscape of the nation. While Article 351 promotes linguistic diversity and the use of Hindi as the official language, Articles 352 to 354 safeguard the nation's sovereignty, security, and financial stability during emergencies. The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the significance of these provisions in responding to unforeseen crises. As India continues to grow and change, the Constitution remains a dynamic and responsive instrument, ensuring the country's resilience in the face of challenges.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more