Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi

Articles 344 to 346 of the Indian Constitution: Language and Linguistic Minorities in the Modern Era

Articles 344 to 346 of the Indian Constitution: Language and Linguistic Minorities in the Modern Era



Introduction


Articles 344 to 346 of the Indian Constitution pertain to language and linguistic minorities. These articles recognize the importance of preserving linguistic diversity and promoting the rights of minority language speakers in India. In the modern era, these provisions continue to play a pivotal role in upholding cultural and linguistic pluralism, but they also require periodic review and adaptation.


Article 344: Commission and Committee of Parliament on Official Language


Article 344 mandates the appointment of a Commission and a Committee of Parliament on Official Language to promote the progressive use of the Hindi language for official purposes.


Case Law: The Evolution of Official Language Policies

In Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute v. State of Bihar (2015), the court emphasized the importance of Article 344 in recognizing Hindi as the official language. However, it also recognized the ongoing relevance of English in official communication in the modern era. This case highlighted the need for a balanced approach that respects linguistic diversity while ensuring effective governance.


Article 345: Official Language or Languages of a State


Article 345 grants each state the authority to specify the official language(s) to be used within its jurisdiction. This provision respects the linguistic diversity within the country.


Case Law: Safeguarding State Language Policies

The case of Rajbala v. State of Haryana (2015) reinforced the autonomy of states in determining their official languages. The court upheld the Haryana Official Language Act, emphasizing the importance of respecting the linguistic choices of individual states. This decision reflects the enduring relevance of Article 345 in acknowledging linguistic diversity.


Article 346: Language for communication between a State and the Union


Article 346 provides for the use of the English language for official communication between states and the Union, acknowledging the linguistic diversity among states.


Case Law: Language for Effective Intergovernmental Communication

In L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997), the Supreme Court upheld the use of English for intergovernmental communication, emphasizing its importance for efficient governance. This case underscores the ongoing significance of Article 346 in enabling effective coordination between states and the Union in the modern era.


Conclusion


Articles 344 to 346 of the Indian Constitution are essential in recognizing and preserving linguistic diversity in the country. They acknowledge the importance of language as an integral part of cultural identity. In the modern era, while some amendments and adaptations may be necessary to reflect the evolving linguistic landscape, it is crucial to uphold the constitutional principles of pluralism, diversity, and inclusion.


The case laws discussed in this article illustrate the ongoing relevance of these articles in the contemporary context. They emphasize the need for a balanced approach that respects linguistic diversity while ensuring effective governance. As India's legal system and policymakers continue to engage in this ongoing discourse, they must strive to foster a society that is inclusive, equitable, and reflective of the constitutional values of linguistic and cultural pluralism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Equality Before Law