Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

A Contemporary Discourse on Indian Constitution Articles 333 to 336: Revisiting Reservations in the Modern Era

A Contemporary Discourse on Indian Constitution Articles 333 to 336: Revisiting Reservations in the Modern Era



Introduction


The Indian Constitution is a living document, capable of adaptation and evolution as society progresses. This adaptability is evident in its provisions concerning reservations. Articles 333 to 336 of the Indian Constitution address the reservation of seats in legislatures for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs), ensuring their participation in the political process. However, as India strides forward in the 21st century, it is essential to revisit these provisions and their implications in the modern era.


Article 333: Representation of the Anglo-Indian community


Article 333 deals with the representation of the Anglo-Indian community in the House of the People (Lok Sabha). Historically, this provision was crucial in ensuring that this community had a voice in India's political landscape. However, with the dwindling Anglo-Indian population, the relevance of this provision has been questioned.


Case Law: Relevance of Article 333 in the Modern Era

The case of R. Christudas v. Union of India (2019) highlights this issue. The court upheld the constitutional validity of Article 333 but noted the decreasing population of the Anglo-Indian community. The court stressed the need for periodic review and possible reconsideration of this provision to align it with contemporary demographic realities.


Article 334: Reservation of seats and special representation


Article 334 deals with the reservation of seats for SCs and STs in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies. While the intent behind this provision is laudable – to provide historically disadvantaged communities with adequate representation – questions have arisen concerning the need for continued reservations.


Case Law: The Mandate of Article 334 in a Changing India

In M. Nagaraj v. Union of India (2006), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of Article 334 in ensuring the political empowerment of SCs and STs. However, it also laid down certain guidelines to prevent misuse of the reservation system, such as the requirement to show backwardness and inadequacy of representation.


Article 335: Claims of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to services and posts


Article 335 addresses the claims of SCs and STs to services and posts under the state. It underlines the importance of ensuring equality of opportunity in matters of public employment.


Case Law: Article 335 and the Merit vs. Reservation Debate

In Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992), the Supreme Court upheld the reservation of posts for SCs, STs, and other backward classes while emphasizing that reservations should not affect the efficiency of administration. This case exemplifies the ongoing debate about striking a balance between meritocracy and social justice in the context of reservation policies.


Article 336: Special provision for Anglo-Indian community in certain services


Article 336 provides for the reservation of certain posts for the Anglo-Indian community in services. As with Article 333, the relevance of this provision has been questioned in the modern era.


Case Law: Revisiting the Special Provisions for Anglo-Indians

In D. Madhav Rao v. Union of India (2017), the Supreme Court upheld Article 336 while emphasizing the need for periodic review. The court stressed that the reservation of posts for the Anglo-Indian community should not become a permanent feature and must evolve in accordance with demographic changes.


Conclusion


Articles 333 to 336 of the Indian Constitution have played a pivotal role in ensuring political representation and equal opportunity for historically disadvantaged communities. However, the modern era demands a reevaluation of these provisions in light of shifting demographics and changing socio-economic dynamics. It is imperative to strike a balance between preserving the principles of social justice and ensuring merit-based governance. The discussed case laws underscore the need for periodic review and adaptation of these constitutional provisions to align them with the contemporary realities of India. In this process, the Indian legal system and policymakers must engage in a nuanced and inclusive dialogue to foster a fair and equitable society while upholding the principles of the Constitution.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more