Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Top 10 Landmark Judgments in the Indian Constitution: Shaping India's Legal Landscape till 2023

Top 10 Landmark Judgments in the Indian Constitution: Shaping India's 

Legal Landscape till 2023



Introduction


The Indian Constitution is the bedrock of the country's legal system, providing a framework for justice, equality, and fundamental rights. Over the years, the judiciary has delivered several landmark judgments that have had a profound impact on Indian society. This article explores the top 10 landmark judgments in the Indian Constitution until 2023, highlighting their significance in shaping India's legal landscape.


1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973):

In the historic Kesavananda Bharati case, the Supreme Court established the doctrine of basic structure, asserting that certain fundamental features of the Constitution cannot be amended. This landmark judgment curtailed the amending power of the Parliament and safeguarded the core values and principles enshrined in the Constitution.


2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978):

The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the scope of Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The Supreme Court ruled that the right to life encompasses personal dignity, privacy, and the freedom to travel abroad. This judgment broadened the interpretation and protection of fundamental rights.


3. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975):

In a significant case, the Supreme Court declared the election of then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi void due to electoral malpractices. This judgment upheld the principles of free and fair elections and established that no one, including the Prime Minister, is above the law.


4. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997):

The Vishaka case recognized sexual harassment at the workplace as a violation of fundamental rights. The Supreme Court formulated guidelines to prevent and address sexual harassment, leading to the enactment of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act in 2013.


5. S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994):

The S.R. Bommai case dealt with the dismissal of state governments by the President under Article 356. The Supreme Court held that the power to impose President's Rule should be exercised judiciously and only in exceptional circumstances. This judgment protected federalism and democratic principles.


6. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018):

In a historic judgment, the Supreme Court decriminalized consensual same-sex relations by striking down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. This landmark decision affirmed the rights, equality, and dignity of the LGBTQ+ community under the Constitution.


7. S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1982):

In the S.P. Gupta case, the Supreme Court upheld the independence of the judiciary and established the principle of judicial collegium for the appointment and transfer of judges. This judgment played a vital role in preserving the judiciary's autonomy and maintaining the separation of powers.


8. Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017):

The Shayara Bano case challenged the constitutionality of instant triple talaq, a practice followed in Muslim personal law. The Supreme Court declared instant triple talaq as unconstitutional and discriminatory, reaffirming gender equality and women's rights.


9. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017):

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court recognized the right to privacy as a fundamental right inherent in Article 21. This judgment strengthened the protection of individual privacy and set the stage for subsequent decisions safeguarding privacy rights.


10. ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976):

The ADM Jabalpur case, also known as the Habeas Corpus case, was a contentious judgment. It emphasized the importance of judicial review and the protection of fundamental rights even during emergencies. The Supreme Court affirmed that even in times of emergency, the right to life and personal liberty cannot be entirely suspended.


Conclusion :


The Indian judiciary has played a pivotal role in interpreting and upholding the Constitution, delivering landmark judgments that have shaped India's legal landscape. The top 10 landmark judgments discussed above have addressed a wide range of issues, from the protection of fundamental rights to the independence of the judiciary and the recognition of the rights of marginalized communities. These judgments have not only safeguarded constitutional principles but have also contributed to the evolution of a progressive and inclusive society.


As India moves forward, it is crucial to build upon these landmark judgments and ensure equal rights, justice, and the rule of law for all citizens. The Indian Constitution remains a living document that adapts to the changing times and societal needs. Upholding the spirit of these landmark judgments will pave the way for a just and inclusive India, where every citizen's rights and dignity are protected.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more