Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Top 10 Landmark Judgments in the Indian Constitution: Shaping India's Legal Landscape till 2023

Top 10 Landmark Judgments in the Indian Constitution: Shaping India's 

Legal Landscape till 2023



Introduction


The Indian Constitution is the bedrock of the country's legal system, providing a framework for justice, equality, and fundamental rights. Over the years, the judiciary has delivered several landmark judgments that have had a profound impact on Indian society. This article explores the top 10 landmark judgments in the Indian Constitution until 2023, highlighting their significance in shaping India's legal landscape.


1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973):

In the historic Kesavananda Bharati case, the Supreme Court established the doctrine of basic structure, asserting that certain fundamental features of the Constitution cannot be amended. This landmark judgment curtailed the amending power of the Parliament and safeguarded the core values and principles enshrined in the Constitution.


2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978):

The Maneka Gandhi case expanded the scope of Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The Supreme Court ruled that the right to life encompasses personal dignity, privacy, and the freedom to travel abroad. This judgment broadened the interpretation and protection of fundamental rights.


3. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975):

In a significant case, the Supreme Court declared the election of then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi void due to electoral malpractices. This judgment upheld the principles of free and fair elections and established that no one, including the Prime Minister, is above the law.


4. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997):

The Vishaka case recognized sexual harassment at the workplace as a violation of fundamental rights. The Supreme Court formulated guidelines to prevent and address sexual harassment, leading to the enactment of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act in 2013.


5. S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994):

The S.R. Bommai case dealt with the dismissal of state governments by the President under Article 356. The Supreme Court held that the power to impose President's Rule should be exercised judiciously and only in exceptional circumstances. This judgment protected federalism and democratic principles.


6. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018):

In a historic judgment, the Supreme Court decriminalized consensual same-sex relations by striking down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. This landmark decision affirmed the rights, equality, and dignity of the LGBTQ+ community under the Constitution.


7. S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1982):

In the S.P. Gupta case, the Supreme Court upheld the independence of the judiciary and established the principle of judicial collegium for the appointment and transfer of judges. This judgment played a vital role in preserving the judiciary's autonomy and maintaining the separation of powers.


8. Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017):

The Shayara Bano case challenged the constitutionality of instant triple talaq, a practice followed in Muslim personal law. The Supreme Court declared instant triple talaq as unconstitutional and discriminatory, reaffirming gender equality and women's rights.


9. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017):

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court recognized the right to privacy as a fundamental right inherent in Article 21. This judgment strengthened the protection of individual privacy and set the stage for subsequent decisions safeguarding privacy rights.


10. ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976):

The ADM Jabalpur case, also known as the Habeas Corpus case, was a contentious judgment. It emphasized the importance of judicial review and the protection of fundamental rights even during emergencies. The Supreme Court affirmed that even in times of emergency, the right to life and personal liberty cannot be entirely suspended.


Conclusion :


The Indian judiciary has played a pivotal role in interpreting and upholding the Constitution, delivering landmark judgments that have shaped India's legal landscape. The top 10 landmark judgments discussed above have addressed a wide range of issues, from the protection of fundamental rights to the independence of the judiciary and the recognition of the rights of marginalized communities. These judgments have not only safeguarded constitutional principles but have also contributed to the evolution of a progressive and inclusive society.


As India moves forward, it is crucial to build upon these landmark judgments and ensure equal rights, justice, and the rule of law for all citizens. The Indian Constitution remains a living document that adapts to the changing times and societal needs. Upholding the spirit of these landmark judgments will pave the way for a just and inclusive India, where every citizen's rights and dignity are protected.

Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more