Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Ensuring Equality in Matters of Public Employment: Exploring Articles 325 to 327 of the Indian Constitution

Ensuring Equality in Matters of Public Employment: Exploring Articles 325 to 327 of the Indian Constitution



Introduction :

Articles 325 to 327 of the Indian Constitution are vital provisions that ensure equality in matters of public employment. These articles aim to eliminate discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth in the context of eligibility and access to public employment opportunities. In this article, we delve into a comprehensive discussion, exploring the significance of these articles in the modern era and analyzing relevant case laws that shed light on their application and relevance in contemporary India.


Article 325: Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth :

Article 325 guarantees the right to equality in matters of public employment, irrespective of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It prohibits any discrimination or preference in public employment based on these grounds. In the case of the State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan, the Supreme Court held that Article 325 mandates equality of opportunity in public employment and forbids any discriminatory practice that limits access to employment based on the mentioned criteria. This landmark judgment emphasized the importance of Article 325 in promoting inclusivity and equal opportunities in public employment.


Article 326: Adult suffrage :

Article 326 embodies the principle of universal adult suffrage, granting every citizen above the age of 18 the right to vote without any discrimination. While Article 326 primarily addresses the right to vote, its implications for public employment are significant. The case of Javed v. the State of Haryana highlights the link between voting rights and public employment. The Supreme Court, in this case, ruled that denying employment opportunities based on an individual's voting preference violates the principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in Article 326. This case underlines the interplay between voting rights and public employment, emphasizing the need for equal treatment and non-discriminatory practices.


Article 327: Power of Parliament to make provision with respect to elections to legislatures :

Article 327 empowers the Parliament to enact legislation concerning the conduct of elections to legislatures, including matters related to qualifications and disqualifications of candidates. While there may not be specific case laws directly related to Article 327, its provisions are crucial for ensuring fair and transparent elections, which, in turn, have a significant impact on public employment. The exercise of this power by Parliament is essential in establishing eligibility criteria and disqualifications for individuals seeking public office, promoting integrity and accountability in the political sphere.


Conclusion :

Articles 325 to 327 of the Indian Constitution play a pivotal role in ensuring equality and non-discrimination in matters of public employment. Through relevant case laws and practical examples, we have observed the significance of these provisions in upholding the principles of equal opportunity and inclusivity. As India continues to evolve in the modern era, it is crucial to sustain the discourse surrounding Articles 325 to 327, fostering a society where access to public employment is based on merit and individual capabilities, irrespective of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. These provisions form the bedrock of a just and egalitarian society, where every citizen can contribute and participate in the nation's progress.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more