Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi
Post a Comment

Ensuring Equality in Matters of Public Employment: Exploring Articles 325 to 327 of the Indian Constitution

Ensuring Equality in Matters of Public Employment: Exploring Articles 325 to 327 of the Indian Constitution



Introduction :

Articles 325 to 327 of the Indian Constitution are vital provisions that ensure equality in matters of public employment. These articles aim to eliminate discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth in the context of eligibility and access to public employment opportunities. In this article, we delve into a comprehensive discussion, exploring the significance of these articles in the modern era and analyzing relevant case laws that shed light on their application and relevance in contemporary India.


Article 325: Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth :

Article 325 guarantees the right to equality in matters of public employment, irrespective of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It prohibits any discrimination or preference in public employment based on these grounds. In the case of the State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan, the Supreme Court held that Article 325 mandates equality of opportunity in public employment and forbids any discriminatory practice that limits access to employment based on the mentioned criteria. This landmark judgment emphasized the importance of Article 325 in promoting inclusivity and equal opportunities in public employment.


Article 326: Adult suffrage :

Article 326 embodies the principle of universal adult suffrage, granting every citizen above the age of 18 the right to vote without any discrimination. While Article 326 primarily addresses the right to vote, its implications for public employment are significant. The case of Javed v. the State of Haryana highlights the link between voting rights and public employment. The Supreme Court, in this case, ruled that denying employment opportunities based on an individual's voting preference violates the principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in Article 326. This case underlines the interplay between voting rights and public employment, emphasizing the need for equal treatment and non-discriminatory practices.


Article 327: Power of Parliament to make provision with respect to elections to legislatures :

Article 327 empowers the Parliament to enact legislation concerning the conduct of elections to legislatures, including matters related to qualifications and disqualifications of candidates. While there may not be specific case laws directly related to Article 327, its provisions are crucial for ensuring fair and transparent elections, which, in turn, have a significant impact on public employment. The exercise of this power by Parliament is essential in establishing eligibility criteria and disqualifications for individuals seeking public office, promoting integrity and accountability in the political sphere.


Conclusion :

Articles 325 to 327 of the Indian Constitution play a pivotal role in ensuring equality and non-discrimination in matters of public employment. Through relevant case laws and practical examples, we have observed the significance of these provisions in upholding the principles of equal opportunity and inclusivity. As India continues to evolve in the modern era, it is crucial to sustain the discourse surrounding Articles 325 to 327, fostering a society where access to public employment is based on merit and individual capabilities, irrespective of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. These provisions form the bedrock of a just and egalitarian society, where every citizen can contribute and participate in the nation's progress.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Image
 Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18 INTRODUCTION The idea of equality referenced under Article 14 to Article 18 upgrades a more extensive idea and a more extensive part of the examination as the subject of equity itself shapes a vital and powerful idea in itself. The idea of fairness overwhelms the exceptionally two significant ideas of equivalent security of law and equity under the steady gaze of the law. Likewise, the idea of uniformity wins in a wide range of establishments and accommodates equivalent freedoms for people with the abrogation of unapproachable and nullification of titles. The idea is a more extensive methodology as it is significant for society to look to each individual with a similar methodology regardless of his sexual orientation, rank, and religion. The law is visually impaired and is equivalent for each individual as it says that balance wins for each individual and each individual has the option to be secured by the law. Evolution  The fundamenta
Read more

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Image
Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren Cognizance Taken by PMLA Court A Special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Ranchi has taken cognizance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) against Hemant Soren, the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand and leader of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The complaint, comprising 5,500 pages, pertains to a money laundering case related to a land 'scam'. The central probe agency has also attached 8.5 acres of land in connection with the case. Detention and Extended Custody Hemant Soren, who was arrested on January 31, is currently detained at the Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar, Ranchi. His judicial custody was extended till April 4 by the PMLA court on March 21. Additionally, on February 29, the Jharkhand High Court dismissed a petition filed by Soren seeking permission to attend the budget session of the state assembly. Allegations by the Enforcement Directorat
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth." In article 14 there two  approaches which include negative
Read more