Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity

Image
Bar Council of India Removes 107 Fake Advocates from  Delhi Roll to Uphold Legal Integrity The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken decisive action in a sweeping initiative aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession by removing 107 fake advocates  from the Roll of Advocates in Delhi  between 2019 and October 2024. This step comes as part of the BCI's rigorous verification process to ensure that only qualified, genuinely practising advocates remain in the profession, ultimately upholding public trust in the legal system. Strengthened Verification Framework Under Rule 32 This effort falls under Rule 32 of the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015 . The BCI  amended Rule 32 on June 23, 2023 , which empowered the BCI to verify, identify, and systematically remove unqualified and fake advocates from the Roll. The rule amendment has made the process of weeding out non-compliant individuals significantly more efficient. Accordi

Articles 314 to 317 of the Indian Constitution: Services of the State Public Service Commissions



Introduction :

The Indian Constitution includes provisions regarding the establishment and functioning of State Public Service Commissions. Articles 314 to 317 outline these provisions, focusing on the composition, powers, and functions of State Public Service Commissions. In this article, we engage in a comprehensive discussion, exploring the relevance of these articles in the modern era and analyzing relevant case laws that shed light on their significance in contemporary India.


Article 314: Appointment of the Chairman and members of the State Public Service Commission :

Article 314 addresses the appointment of the Chairman and members of the State Public Service Commission (SPSC). The provision ensures that the appointments are made by the Governor of the state. However, specific case laws directly related to Article 314 are limited. Nevertheless, the provision emphasizes the importance of ensuring the independence and impartiality of the SPSC members, as they play a crucial role in conducting recruitment examinations and advising the state government on matters related to the civil services.


Article 315: Public Service Commission for the Union and for the states :

Article 315 establishes the Public Service Commission (PSC) for the Union and the states. It outlines the composition and functions of the PSC, including conducting examinations, making recommendations for appointments, and advising on disciplinary matters. The case of Ram Gopal Singh v. Union of India provides insights into the interpretation and application of Article 315. The Supreme Court, in this case, held that the primary duty of the PSC is to assess the merit and suitability of candidates for public service appointments, ensuring fairness and transparency in the selection process. This judgment emphasizes the importance of Article 315 in upholding the principles of meritocracy and equal opportunity in the recruitment of civil servants.


Article 316: Appointment and term of office of members  :

Article 316 governs the appointment and term of office of members of the State Public Service Commission. It outlines the qualifications, appointment process, and tenure of members. The case of K. Ratnakar Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh provides insights into the interpretation and application of Article 316. The Supreme Court, in this case, emphasized that the appointment of SPSC members should be based on objective criteria and should not be subject to political influence or patronage. This judgment underscores the importance of Article 316 in ensuring the independence and integrity of the SPSC members, enabling them to perform their duties without bias or favoritism.


Article 317: Removal and suspension of a member of a Public Service Commission :

Article 317 deals with the removal and suspension of a member of the SPSC. It establishes a specific procedure for the removal or suspension of a member, ensuring that it is based on grounds of misbehavior or incapacity. While there may not be specific case laws directly related to Article 317, the provision emphasizes the importance of protecting the members of the SPSC from arbitrary removal or suspension, preserving their independence and integrity.


Conclusion :

Articles 314 to 317 of the Indian Constitution provide a framework for the establishment and functioning of State Public Service Commissions. Through relevant case laws and practical examples, we have observed the significance of these provisions in ensuring the independence, transparency, and effectiveness of the SPSC in the recruitment and selection of civil servants. As India progresses in the modern era, it is crucial to sustain the discourse surrounding Articles 314 to 317, fostering a robust and merit-based public service system that upholds the principles of fairness, impartiality, and professionalism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution of Constitution under Article 14 to 18

Legal Proceedings Initiated Against Former Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren

Equality Before Law