Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...
Post a Comment

Articles 314 to 317 of the Indian Constitution: Services of the State Public Service Commissions



Introduction :

The Indian Constitution includes provisions regarding the establishment and functioning of State Public Service Commissions. Articles 314 to 317 outline these provisions, focusing on the composition, powers, and functions of State Public Service Commissions. In this article, we engage in a comprehensive discussion, exploring the relevance of these articles in the modern era and analyzing relevant case laws that shed light on their significance in contemporary India.


Article 314: Appointment of the Chairman and members of the State Public Service Commission :

Article 314 addresses the appointment of the Chairman and members of the State Public Service Commission (SPSC). The provision ensures that the appointments are made by the Governor of the state. However, specific case laws directly related to Article 314 are limited. Nevertheless, the provision emphasizes the importance of ensuring the independence and impartiality of the SPSC members, as they play a crucial role in conducting recruitment examinations and advising the state government on matters related to the civil services.


Article 315: Public Service Commission for the Union and for the states :

Article 315 establishes the Public Service Commission (PSC) for the Union and the states. It outlines the composition and functions of the PSC, including conducting examinations, making recommendations for appointments, and advising on disciplinary matters. The case of Ram Gopal Singh v. Union of India provides insights into the interpretation and application of Article 315. The Supreme Court, in this case, held that the primary duty of the PSC is to assess the merit and suitability of candidates for public service appointments, ensuring fairness and transparency in the selection process. This judgment emphasizes the importance of Article 315 in upholding the principles of meritocracy and equal opportunity in the recruitment of civil servants.


Article 316: Appointment and term of office of members  :

Article 316 governs the appointment and term of office of members of the State Public Service Commission. It outlines the qualifications, appointment process, and tenure of members. The case of K. Ratnakar Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh provides insights into the interpretation and application of Article 316. The Supreme Court, in this case, emphasized that the appointment of SPSC members should be based on objective criteria and should not be subject to political influence or patronage. This judgment underscores the importance of Article 316 in ensuring the independence and integrity of the SPSC members, enabling them to perform their duties without bias or favoritism.


Article 317: Removal and suspension of a member of a Public Service Commission :

Article 317 deals with the removal and suspension of a member of the SPSC. It establishes a specific procedure for the removal or suspension of a member, ensuring that it is based on grounds of misbehavior or incapacity. While there may not be specific case laws directly related to Article 317, the provision emphasizes the importance of protecting the members of the SPSC from arbitrary removal or suspension, preserving their independence and integrity.


Conclusion :

Articles 314 to 317 of the Indian Constitution provide a framework for the establishment and functioning of State Public Service Commissions. Through relevant case laws and practical examples, we have observed the significance of these provisions in ensuring the independence, transparency, and effectiveness of the SPSC in the recruitment and selection of civil servants. As India progresses in the modern era, it is crucial to sustain the discourse surrounding Articles 314 to 317, fostering a robust and merit-based public service system that upholds the principles of fairness, impartiality, and professionalism.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Image
Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines Background In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set out guidelines to curb arbitrary demolitions, commonly referred to as "bulldozer justice." This term has emerged from instances where properties of individuals accused of crimes have been demolished without following due legal process. The ruling responds to several petitions highlighting the destruction of residential and commercial properties without prior notice, which, according to petitioners, targets marginalized and minority communities. Key Principles Addressed The Supreme Court’s decision rests on critical constitutional principles, particularly the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights . The Court emphasized that no person should be punished without due process and that arbitrary action by the executive undermines citizens’ trust in the justice system. Justice Gavai, in del...
Read more

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Image
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager  Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores  The Delhi High Court has granted bail to Varun Vashista , a former bank manager accused of embezzling over ₹13 crores from a customer’s account while working at ICICI Bank's Vikas Puri branch. The bail was approved by Justice Amit Mahajan on November 12, 2024, after considering the evidence and facts of the case.   Details of the Case The allegations against Vashista stem from his role as a branch manager. The complainant and her husband had entrusted him with managing their investments, amounting to ₹13.5 crores, between 2019 and 2023.   The complainant discovered in January 2024 that nearly ₹12 crores had been **siphoned off** from her account. Key allegations include:   - Creation of Fake Fixed Deposits: The accused reportedly created fraudulent fixed deposit accounts in the complainant’s name.   - Misappropriation of Funds: Funds were tr...
Read more

Equality Before Law

Image
                            Equality Before Law                                                   Introduction The rule of law was firstly introduced by A.V. Dicey in  his book "The Constitution Of England" in which there is rule which only prevails is law in which all are equal. In simple word if any wrong is being done which is not justifiable  by law committed by anyone that may be president, prime minister, or any individual are punishable because there is supremacy of law. Supremacy of law means the government which is power or the people who elected the government all will be treated equally before law.  Article 14 The Indian Constitution 1949, Article 14 guarantees "Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the...
Read more