Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...

Articles 306 to 309 of the Indian Constitution: Taxes on Professions, Trades, and Callings

Articles 306 to 309 of the Indian Constitution: Taxes on Professions, Trades, and Callings



Introduction :

The Indian Constitution incorporates provisions regarding the imposition and regulation of taxes on professions, trades, and callings. Articles 306 to 309 outline these provisions, focusing on the power of the Union and the states to levy and collect taxes for revenue purposes. In this article, we engage in a comprehensive discussion, exploring the relevance of these articles in the modern era and analyzing relevant case laws that shed light on their significance in contemporary India.


Article 306: Taxes on professions, trades, and callings :

Article 306 grants the power to the Union and the states to levy taxes on professions, trades, and callings. This provision enables the government to generate revenue through the taxation of various professional activities. The case of the State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley & Co. provides insights into the interpretation and application of Article 306. The Supreme Court, in this case, held that a tax on professions, trades, and callings is permissible as long as it is a direct tax on the occupation itself and not on the income derived from that occupation. This judgment emphasizes the significance of Article 306 in ensuring the legality and constitutional validity of taxes imposed on professional activities.


Article 307: Power of Parliament to impose restrictions on the state's power of taxation :

Article 307 empowers the Parliament to impose restrictions on the power of the states to levy taxes on professions, trades, and callings. This provision ensures that the Union can regulate and coordinate taxation policies across the country. While there may not be specific case laws directly related to Article 307, the provision underscores the importance of maintaining fiscal harmony and avoiding conflicting tax regulations among the states.


Article 308: Power of the states to levy duties and taxes on professions, trades, callings, and employments :

Article 308 grants the power to the states to levy duties and taxes on professions, trades, callings, and employments. This provision enables the states to generate revenue through the taxation of various economic activities conducted within their jurisdictions. The case of the State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd provides insights into the interpretation and application of Article 308. The Supreme Court, in this case, held that a tax imposed under Article 308 should have a reasonable nexus with the activity or occupation being taxed. This judgment highlights the significance of Article 308 in ensuring that state taxes on professions, trades, callings, and employments are reasonable and within the constitutional framework.


Article 309: Power of the states to impose taxes on the entry of goods into a local area for consumption, use, or sale :

Article 309 grants the power to the states to impose taxes on the entry of goods into a local area for consumption, use, or sale. This provision enables the states to levy taxes on the importation of goods and contributes to their revenue generation. The case of Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. v. the State of Assam provides insights into the interpretation and application of Article 309. The Supreme Court, in this case, emphasized that the state's power to impose taxes on the entry of goods is subject to the limitations imposed by Article 304(b), which prohibits discriminatory taxes that hinder the free flow of goods across state boundaries. This judgment underscores the importance of balancing revenue generation with the principles of non-discrimination and free trade.


Conclusion :

Articles 306 to 309 of the Indian Constitution provide a framework for the imposition and regulation of taxes on professions, trades, and callings. Through relevant case laws and practical examples, we have observed the significance of these provisions in enabling the Union and the states to levy taxes for revenue purposes, ensuring the legality and constitutional validity of such taxes, maintaining fiscal harmony among the states, and regulating the taxation of goods entering local areas. As India progresses in the modern era, it is crucial to sustain the discourse surrounding Articles 306 to 309, facilitating a balanced taxation system that promotes economic growth, protects the rights of individuals and businesses, and upholds the principles of fiscal responsibility and transparency.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Equality Before Law