Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...

Unveiling the Significance of Article 23 of the Indian Constitution: A Contemporary Discussion with Relevant Case Laws

Unveiling the Significance of Article 23 of the Indian Constitution: A Contemporary Discussion with Relevant Case Laws



Introduction:

The Indian Constitution, as the fundamental legal framework of the country, incorporates several provisions aimed at protecting the rights and liberties of its citizens. Among these is Article 23, which prohibits human trafficking and forced labor. This article delves into the contemporary relevance of Article 23, shedding light on its interpretation through relevant case laws and exploring its significance in the modern era.


Understanding Article 23:

Article 23 of the Indian Constitution states, "Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labor. (1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labor are prohibited, and any contravention of this provision shall be an offense punishable in accordance with law." This provision firmly establishes the state's commitment to eradicate any form of exploitation, servitude, or forced labor prevalent in society.


Discussion:


1. Contemporary Perspectives:

In today's modern era, Article 23 assumes greater significance due to the persisting challenges posed by human trafficking and forced labor. These issues have become increasingly complex, requiring a comprehensive approach that combines legal measures, social awareness, and international cooperation.


2. Expanding the Horizon: Judicial Interpretations:

The Indian judiciary has played a pivotal role in interpreting and expanding the scope of Article 23. In the landmark case of People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India (1982), the Supreme Court recognized that forced labor extends beyond traditional forms and encompasses various manifestations of exploitation. The court held that any work extracted under threat, coercion, or compulsion, even if it is ostensibly voluntary, would fall within the purview of forced labor.


3. Bonded Labor and Article 23:

Bonded labor, often referred to as debt bondage, remains a pervasive problem in India. The Bonded Labor System (Abolition) Act, 1976, was enacted to address this issue, providing legal protections against bonded labor and ensuring the rehabilitation of affected individuals. In Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India (1984), the Supreme Court acknowledged the link between bonded labor and Article 23, emphasizing that any form of forced labor violates the dignity and freedom of an individual.


4. Human Trafficking and Article 23:

Human trafficking, a grave violation of human rights, continues to pose significant challenges globally. In India, The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, was enacted to combat human trafficking and protect victims. In Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal (2011), the Supreme Court declared that trafficking for the purpose of forced labor falls within the ambit of Article 23, emphasizing the need for stringent measures to combat this heinous crime.


5. Intersectionality and Vulnerable Groups:

Article 23 assumes particular significance when it comes to protecting vulnerable groups, such as women, children, and marginalized communities. The Supreme Court, in Gaurav Jain v. Union of India (1997), highlighted that Article 23 not only prohibits the direct exploitation of individuals but also prohibits practices that create circumstances akin to forced labor.


Conclusion:

Article 23 of the Indian Constitution stands as a powerful provision, reflecting the commitment of the Indian state to combat human trafficking and forced labor. In the face of contemporary challenges, the interpretation of Article 23 by the judiciary has been instrumental in broadening its scope and ensuring its relevance in the modern era. Through landmark case laws, the courts have recognized the diverse manifestations of forced labor and emphasized the protection of vulnerable groups. However, the fight against human trafficking and forced labor requires sustained efforts, including legal reforms, social awareness, and international cooperation, to safeguard the rights and dignity of all individuals.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Equality Before Law