Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces

Image
Supreme Court Advocates for Childcare and Feeding Rooms in Public Spaces The Supreme Court of India has suggested that the Union Government develop a comprehensive policy addressing the construction of feeding rooms and childcare facilities  in public places. This move aims to ensure that nursing mothers and their children can access basic amenities in a dignified and private manner, reinforcing their fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. SC Encourages Policy Formulation A bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna  and Justice N Kotiswar Singh  highlighted the absence of a structured framework to address this pressing issue. The court advised the Centre to propose a policy that could then be implemented across the states, scheduling the next hearing for December 10, 2024.   The apex court emphasized that before issuing formal directions, it was crucial to understand the Centre’s perspective on implementing the petitioner’s demand for childcare and feedi...

Article 28 of the Indian Constitution: Navigating Education and Religion in the Modern Era

Article 28 of the Indian Constitution: Navigating Education and Religion in the Modern Era



Introduction:


Article 28 of the Indian Constitution plays a crucial role in balancing the principles of education and religion in a diverse society like India. It provides for the protection of the rights of religious and linguistic minorities to establish and manage their educational institutions while ensuring that these institutions do not promote discrimination or religious indoctrination. As India progresses further into the modern era, it becomes increasingly important to examine the implications of Article 28 and its compatibility with the evolving educational and religious landscape.


The Constitutional Mandate:


Article 28 encompasses three distinct clauses: 


1. Clause 1: It ensures that no religious instruction is provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of state funds. The objective is to maintain a secular and inclusive atmosphere in government-funded institutions. This provision prohibits the promotion of any particular religion, thereby fostering a sense of unity and equality among students.


2. Clause 2: This clause allows religious and linguistic minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. It recognizes the importance of preserving the cultural and religious identity of minorities, ensuring their right to impart education while enjoying autonomy over the management and administration of these institutions.


3. Clause 3: It prevents discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, language, or any other social factor in the admission process of educational institutions. This clause upholds the principle of equality and protects individuals from discriminatory practices while seeking admission to any educational institution.


Interpretation and Case Laws:


To fully comprehend the implications of Article 28 in the modern era, it is essential to delve into relevant case laws that have shaped its interpretation and application. 


One significant case is the landmark judgment in T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002). The Supreme Court, in this case, emphasized that the right of minority institutions to administer and manage their affairs includes the right to admit students belonging to their own community. However, it also held that minority institutions should not resort to excessive profiteering or commercialization. This judgment struck a balance between the autonomy of minority institutions and the need for transparency and accountability.


Another crucial case is the Islamic Academy of Education v. State of Karnataka (2003). The Supreme Court, while interpreting Article 28, emphasized the importance of maintaining secular character in educational institutions. It held that religious instructions, even in minority institutions, must be imparted in a manner that is academic, objective, and promotes a spirit of tolerance and understanding. This judgment reinforced the idea that religious education should not lead to religious intolerance or the imposition of one's beliefs on others.


The Modern Era and Challenges:


In the present-day modern era, Article 28 faces new challenges that warrant attention. One such challenge is the emergence of digital education platforms and e-learning. As technology becomes increasingly integrated into education, it is crucial to ensure that online platforms do not become a medium for religious indoctrination or exclusionary practices. Proper guidelines and regulations should be in place to guarantee the secular and inclusive nature of digital educational spaces.


Furthermore, the rise of private educational institutions, particularly those affiliated with religious organizations, raises concerns regarding access, quality, and discrimination. While Article 28 protects the rights of minority institutions, it is essential to strike a balance by ensuring that these institutions adhere to fair practices and do not perpetuate discrimination or exclusivity based on religion or other social factors.


Conclusion:


Article 28 of the Indian Constitution serves as a crucial framework for maintaining the delicate balance between education and religion in a diverse society. The interpretation and application of this Article through landmark case laws have laid the foundation for a secular and inclusive educational system. However, as India continues to progress into the modern era, it becomes imperative to address new challenges such as digital education and the need for ensuring transparency and accountability in private educational institutions.


To meet these challenges, policymakers and stakeholders should focus on developing comprehensive guidelines and regulations that ensure the secular and inclusive nature of education, both in traditional and digital formats. Striking a balance between the autonomy of minority institutions and the need for oversight and regulation is essential.


Additionally, efforts should be made to promote dialogue and understanding among different religious communities within educational institutions. Encouraging interfaith interactions, cultural exchanges, and promoting values of tolerance and pluralism can foster a harmonious and inclusive environment for students.


Moreover, it is crucial to invest in the quality of education across all institutions, regardless of their religious or linguistic affiliation. Adequate infrastructure, trained teachers, and standardized curricula can help bridge the educational divide and ensure equal opportunities for all students, irrespective of their backgrounds.


In conclusion, Article 28 of the Indian Constitution plays a pivotal role in safeguarding the right to education and religious freedom in a diverse society like India. While it provides autonomy to minority institutions, it also upholds the principles of secularism, equality, and inclusiveness. As India progresses into the modern era, it is imperative to address the challenges posed by digital education and private institutions, while ensuring that the values enshrined in Article 28 continue to guide the development of an equitable and inclusive educational system. By doing so, India can foster an environment where education becomes a catalyst for unity, tolerance, and progress.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process: Curbing “Bulldozer Justice” with Strict Guidelines

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Former Bank Manager Accused of Defrauding Woman of ₹13 Crores

Equality Before Law